MODUL
Design
TYP
Erkenntnis
SOURCE
Workshop: Rooted Resurgence - by Vanessa Amoah Opoku
Workshop: Creative Amplifyers,
Ludwig Zeller
In the past year i have worked alot with ChatGPT, exploring it as a Tool for writing and idea-enhancement. I am using ChatGPT as a "Amplifyer" for my Ideas and my Writing, for my Selfexpression and Refelction. In the Workshop "Rooted Resurgence by Vanessa Opoku", while working on the project "Plastic Garden", the following question emerged.
(With the following Prompt: "enhance my suggestion if you think it can be enhanced")
- Highlights your role more prominently, stating that the core ideas and authorship are yours.
- Clarifies AI's function as an assistive tool, contributing to enhancement and refinement, rather than the creation of the core content.
- Conveys the collaborative nature of the work, positioning ChatGPT as a supportive element in the creative process rather than a co-equal partner.
This phrasing maintains the spirit of your original suggestion while adding clarity and emphasis on your primary role in the creative process.
The evolving role of AI in creative collaborations necessitates a nuanced approach to attribution. It is essential to credit AI transparently when it plays a significant role, akin to acknowledging a ghostwriter. This can be communicated through clear statements in the content, highlighting that parts were enhanced by AI, such as "Enhanced with the assistance of [AI Tool Name]."
It's crucial to underline the human author's primary role in ideating and shaping the content, possibly stating, “Conceptualized and Authored by [Human Author], with Enhancements by [AI Tool Name].” This emphasizes the human's directive role over the AI's assistive function.
Understanding perceptions of AI as either a tool or an agent is key, as this shapes the allocation of credit and responsibility. The language used in attributing AI's role significantly influences how its contributions are interpreted.
In artistic realms, AI's role is often iterative and experimental. Artists may use AI to generate ideas or specific elements, guiding its output to align with their vision. This collaboration is more about enhancing and refining rather than creating from scratch.
AI as a tool for particular aspects of a project allows artists to retain control over their vision while leveraging AI for its unique capabilities in areas like color testing or texture creation.
Overall, AI's contribution to the creative process is dynamic and varies based on the artist's intentions and usage. The key is to convey that AI is an assistive tool that requires human guidance and creativity, rather than an independent creative entity."
Kaleido Creative Studio: Their article discussed the importance of transparently and appropriately crediting AI in content creation, much like ghostwritten articles. Giving AI Credit Where It’s Due
MIT Media Lab: Their research highlighted how perceptions of AI's anthropomorphism can influence the allocation of credit and responsibility in AI-generated art. Who gets credit for AI-generated art?
Microsoft's "Experimenting with AI as a Creative Collaborator": This provided insights into how artists like Jon Han use AI in an iterative and experimental manner, particularly in generating ideas and specific elements of their work. Experimenting with AI as a Creative Collaborator
These sources contributed to the understanding of how to attribute AI in creative processes, emphasizing the human creator's role and the collaborative nature of such projects.
Nils Niederhauser
n.niederhauser@gmx.ch
:D